seemyrank

Choose your language

What percentile is a ⁦1,700⁩ chess rating?

Here is where ⁦1,700⁩ sits in all eleven pools this site measures — both online platforms, every time control, and FIDE’s own rating list.

⁦1,700⁩, pool by pool
Pool Top Out of
Chess.com Bullet derived Top ⁦20⁩% of that pool ⁦336,344⁩
Chess.com Blitz derived Top ⁦15⁩% of that pool ⁦657,474⁩
Chess.com Rapid derived Top ⁦10⁩% of that pool ⁦466,867⁩
Chess.com Classical derived Top ⁦15⁩% of that pool ⁦38,941⁩
Lichess Bullet Top ⁦39.8⁩% of that pool ⁦336,344⁩
Lichess Blitz Top ⁦30.5⁩% of that pool ⁦657,474⁩
Lichess Rapid Top ⁦23.1⁩% of that pool ⁦466,867⁩
Lichess Classical Top ⁦30.3⁩% of that pool ⁦38,941⁩
FIDE Standard Top ⁦48.3⁩% of that pool ⁦219,444⁩
FIDE Rapid Top ⁦35.5⁩% of that pool ⁦199,783⁩
FIDE Blitz Top ⁦44⁩% of that pool ⁦119,536⁩

The Chess.com rows are derived rather than counted: Chess.com publishes no rating distribution, so its curve is the Lichess population mapped through the measured conversion between the two. Percentiles from it are rounded to the nearest 5 and stop at "top 5% or better". The Lichess and FIDE rows are counted from published data.

What ⁦1,700⁩ actually means

An unremarkable number in a remarkable place: this is where the online distributions start to thin out quickly. Every hundred points from here costs more than the last, and not because chess becomes harder in steps. There are simply fewer people left above you to take rating from, and they give up less of it.

What the next rungs cost
To reach Ratings from Gain
Top 10% from ⁦1,800⁩ +100
Top 5% from ⁦1,950⁩ +250

Band edges, not thresholds: the distributions are counted in bands, so each figure is where that band begins rather than a number you have to hit exactly.

Nearby ratings

Any other rating

This page exists for round hundreds. For anything else — 1,437, 2,051, whatever you actually hold — the lookup takes the number directly and answers from the same distributions.

Look up any rating