seemyrank

Choose your language

What percentile is a ⁦1,900⁩ chess rating?

Here is where ⁦1,900⁩ sits in all eleven pools this site measures — both online platforms, every time control, and FIDE’s own rating list.

⁦1,900⁩, pool by pool
Pool Top Out of
Chess.com Bullet derived Top ⁦10⁩% of that pool ⁦336,344⁩
Chess.com Blitz derived Top ⁦5⁩% of that pool ⁦657,474⁩
Chess.com Rapid derived Top ⁦5⁩% of that pool ⁦466,867⁩
Chess.com Classical derived Top ⁦5⁩% of that pool ⁦38,941⁩
Lichess Bullet Top ⁦25.1⁩% of that pool ⁦336,344⁩
Lichess Blitz Top ⁦15.2⁩% of that pool ⁦657,474⁩
Lichess Rapid Top ⁦10⁩% of that pool ⁦466,867⁩
Lichess Classical Top ⁦12⁩% of that pool ⁦38,941⁩
FIDE Standard Top ⁦20.7⁩% of that pool ⁦219,444⁩
FIDE Rapid Top ⁦13.6⁩% of that pool ⁦199,783⁩
FIDE Blitz Top ⁦18.9⁩% of that pool ⁦119,536⁩

The Chess.com rows are derived rather than counted: Chess.com publishes no rating distribution, so its curve is the Lichess population mapped through the measured conversion between the two. Percentiles from it are rounded to the nearest 5 and stop at "top 5% or better". The Lichess and FIDE rows are counted from published data.

What ⁦1,900⁩ actually means

1,900 is close enough to 2,000 to be genuinely annoying, and it is one of the bands where players most often stall. The reason is arithmetic rather than psychology — you are now playing people who rarely hand anything over, so the rating moves only when your play actually moves. Plateaus here are long and normal.

Nearby ratings

Any other rating

This page exists for round hundreds. For anything else — 1,437, 2,051, whatever you actually hold — the lookup takes the number directly and answers from the same distributions.

Look up any rating