seemyrank

Choose your language

What percentile is a ⁦900⁩ chess rating?

Here is where ⁦900⁩ sits in every pool this site measures. There is no FIDE row: FIDE has issued no rating below 1,400 since 2022, so ⁦900⁩ is an online rating and not a FIDE one of any kind.

⁦900⁩, pool by pool
Pool Top Out of
Chess.com Bullet derived Top ⁦75⁩% of that pool ⁦336,344⁩
Chess.com Blitz derived Top ⁦75⁩% of that pool ⁦657,474⁩
Chess.com Rapid derived Top ⁦70⁩% of that pool ⁦466,867⁩
Chess.com Classical derived Top ⁦85⁩% of that pool ⁦38,941⁩
Lichess Bullet Top ⁦94.3⁩% of that pool ⁦336,344⁩
Lichess Blitz Top ⁦93.3⁩% of that pool ⁦657,474⁩
Lichess Rapid Top ⁦88.8⁩% of that pool ⁦466,867⁩
Lichess Classical Top ⁦97.1⁩% of that pool ⁦38,941⁩

The Chess.com rows are derived rather than counted: Chess.com publishes no rating distribution, so its curve is the Lichess population mapped through the measured conversion between the two. Percentiles from it are rounded to the nearest 5 and stop at "top 5% or better". The Lichess and FIDE rows are counted from published data.

What ⁦900⁩ actually means

Very little separates 900 from 1,100 except how often you leave a piece hanging. Games at this level are decided by a single undefended piece or a missed one-move threat far more often than by any plan. That is not an insult — it is why improvement here is faster than it will ever be again, and why tactics puzzles pay better than opening theory.

What the next rungs cost
To reach Ratings from Gain
Top 50% from ⁦1,250⁩ +350
Top 25% from ⁦1,550⁩ +650
Top 10% from ⁦1,800⁩ +900
Top 5% from ⁦1,950⁩ +1,050

Band edges, not thresholds: the distributions are counted in bands, so each figure is where that band begins rather than a number you have to hit exactly.

Nearby ratings

Any other rating

This page exists for round hundreds. For anything else — 1,437, 2,051, whatever you actually hold — the lookup takes the number directly and answers from the same distributions.

Look up any rating